TeslaTookWhatIPaidFor.comShare →
An open complaint to Tesla

Tesla Took What I Paid For

I paid €6,200 + VAT for the Full Self-Driving package on a car I own outright. Tesla switched it off remotely — then refused warranty service. My car still says the package is “Included.”

€6,200 + VAT paid for FSDDisabled remotely 8 Apr 2026Car still lists it “Included”Warranty service refused~800 owners affected
By Bartosz Hernas, owner of a 2025 Tesla Model Y·VIN XP7YGCEK9SB621959
The 30-second version
  • I bought a 2025 Model Y as its first and only owner, with Full Self-Driving Capability for €6,200 + VAT. It worked for months.
  • On 8 April, Tesla sent a remote configuration update that told my car the package had never been purchased. I lost features I had paid for and relied on — including stop-sign and traffic-light recognition.
  • The reason given: an “unauthorized third-party device.” The only devices I used are standard CANBUS diagnostic tools that modify nothing. I have since removed them.
  • Two Tesla service centres confirmed the car is under warranty and the features don’t work — yet both refused to fix it.
  • FSD is now legal where my car is registered. I finally could use what I paid for. Tesla is preventing me — and won’t answer a single one of my questions.

01What I bought

In Tesla’s ordering system, the Full Self-Driving Capability package was listed at €6,200 (net, pre-VAT). I paid it. The screenshot below is exactly what I bought.

Tesla ordering system showing Full Self-Driving Capability at €6,200
Tesla.com ordering system. Full Self-Driving Capability — €6,200 — “Includes Enhanced Autopilot, plus Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control.”

That last line matters. Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control was a genuine safety feature for me: it stops the car automatically at red lights and stop signs. To this day, the official Tesla mobile app still lists the Full Self-Driving Capability package as included with my vehicle.

02It worked — for months

After delivery I used the package’s advertised features throughout Europe. Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control operated alongside Autopilot, fully and reliably. The car ran without issue for months.

I own the car outright — I do not lease it from Tesla. I take the view that I am entitled to modify a car I own, the same way I might fit custom wheels, a body kit, or new suspension, without the manufacturer penalising me for it.

The “modifications,” in full

I used two CANBUS diagnostic devices — “Commander” by enhauto.com and a device called “Cybertool.” Neither modifies the car or its software. They connect only to the standard CANBUS diagnostic port — the same interface manufacturers provide for diagnostics — and send commands the vehicle already supports.

For example, Commander makes the interior LEDs turn blue when Autopilot is engaged. The car reads a supported signal, sends a supported command, and the colour changes. If the car didn’t support that command, nothing would happen. No PCB altered. No component changed. No original part modified. Tesla itself states publicly that the vehicle software is immutable by third parties.

No safety system — hardware or software — has been modified in any way.

03What happened

On 8 April at 22:27, my car received a remote package-configuration update via Tesla Cloud Config. In effect, Tesla remotely told my car that the €6,200 + VAT package had never been purchased.

In-car notice: Your Autopilot package has returned to its original configuration
On the car’s screen, 22:27. “Your Autopilot package has returned to its original configuration.” The car was downgraded to, effectively, Enhanced Autopilot.

Roughly three hours later, at 02:00, this email arrived.

Tesla email: Your vehicle has detected an unauthorized third-party device
Tesla’s email, 02:00. No device named, no risk specified, no timeline given — only that “some features may be enabled again.”

It is notably vague. It does not say which device was detected, what the safety risk was, how long features would be disabled, or even whether they would return. And the phrase puzzles me: unauthorized third-party device — unauthorised by whom? Every device on my car was authorised by its owner. Me.

04The contradiction

FSD approval rolled out across Europe — the Netherlands first, then Lithuania, then Estonia on 29 May (where my car is registered), and Belgium after that. My car received update 2026.17.5, which enables the new system. This was the moment my investment should finally have paid off.

Instead, the car offers me a “Subscribe” button — as if I had never bought it.

Car screen offering FSD subscription instead of recognising the purchased package
“Full Self-Driving (Supervised) · Trial Period Ended.” The car asks me to subscribe to a feature I already own.

I paid €6,200 + VAT for a package. The car confirms the package is “Included.” And the same car behaves as though it was never bought.

05How the car knows what it has

Every Tesla ships with the same software and the same full set of capabilities. Individual features are switched on or off remotely through “Tesla Cloud Config,” tied to your specific car. It’s the same mechanism that once let Tesla sell cars with the hardware for heated rear seats physically present but disabled — and later let owners pay online to unlock them.

It’s also how Tesla distinguishes Basic Autopilot from Enhanced Autopilot from Full Self-Driving. The distinction is purely software-defined. Which means a feature you paid for can be revoked with a single remote flag — exactly what happened to me.

06Warranty service was refused

My car is under warranty, so I contacted Tesla service centres in Turku, Finland and Warsaw, Poland. Both confirmed the functionality does not work. Both confirmed the car is under warranty. Both refused the claim — saying it is “not serviceable” because the car was intentionally disabled “for safety reasons.”

The Finnish centre told me they could not reactivate the feature even though the device had been removed, because “you may install it again.” By that logic, why not disable the feature on every Tesla — since any car could have such a device fitted?

Car settings showing FSD listed as an included package while the feature is unavailable
The car’s own settings. FSD Capability shown as an “Included Package,” while the FSD option and the stop-sign settings are simply absent.

I am left unable to find any explanation other than this: the “safety reasons” cited actually reduce my safety. For eight weeks my car could not detect stop signs or traffic signals — functionality I had come to rely on.

07The questions Tesla won’t answer

I put these questions to Tesla and its service centres. They remain unanswered. I’ve grouped them by theme.

A The warranty refusal

  • State, in writing, the exact warranty clause that excludes this fault from coverage.
  • On what basis is warranty service denied when it’s agreed the car is under warranty and the safety features do not function?

B The decision to disable

  • Who authorised the remote disablement, and on what documented evidence?
  • Was it automatic or a manual decision by a person? If automatic, what triggered it?
  • What exactly was the “unauthorized third-party device”? Provide its make, model, and the log entry and timestamp of detection.
  • On what legal basis does Tesla remotely disable functionality a customer has already paid for?

C The claimed “safety reasons”

  • What are the “safety reasons,” given the car is now demonstrably less safe than before?
  • Identify the specific safety risk the device created, with supporting documentation.
  • Is Tesla asserting that stop-sign recognition and FSD reduce safety and should be disabled?

D Restoration of the paid features

  • By what date will the FSD functionality be restored?
  • Will all of it return, or only some? List exactly which features will and won’t.
  • The device has been removed — no third-party device is now present. What is the remaining obstacle?
  • What is the formal appeals process, and how do I begin it?

E Compensation

  • What compensation will Tesla provide for the period the paid features were disabled, and how is it calculated?
  • Will Tesla refund a pro-rated portion of the €6,200 + VAT for each day or week the feature was unavailable?

F Policy on modifications & third-party devices

  • Does Tesla consider a standard CANBUS diagnostic device, used through the manufacturer’s own port, “unauthorized”? If so, state that policy publicly.
  • Is there a published list of parts and devices owners may fit without risking the loss of paid features?
  • Will disabling paid features in response to owner modifications be standard practice? Where is this disclosed before purchase?
  • What else can Tesla disable remotely? Could I lose app access — or heated seats — over a third-party part Tesla disapproves of?

I requested a written response within 14 days, addressing each point. I’m still waiting.

08I’m not anti-Tesla

I’m a genuine believer in this technology. I bought two Teslas and pre-paid €12,400 + VAT in total against the promise of FSD. That promise took so long to materialise that I sold one of the cars — losing the value of the package on it.

Now I finally have a working car, with FSD purchased, in a country that permits FSD. And Tesla is deliberately preventing me from using what I paid for. I just want the feature I bought, an answer to my questions, and for this not to happen quietly to anyone else.

~800
And I don’t believe I’m alone. As best I can tell, roughly 800 owners have had the same thing happen — a paid package switched off remotely. Many of them are in countries that have now approved FSD, left paying for a feature they own and are blocked from using.This is my own estimate from talking to other owners, not an official figure. If you’re one of them, please get in touch.

09Timeline

If a feature you paid for can vanish overnight, it isn’t really yours.

Share this so more owners — and Tesla — have to reckon with it. I don’t think I’m the only one: by my count, around 800 owners are in the same position. If a paid feature has been switched off on your car, I’d like to hear from you.

Press, lawyers, regulators, or affected owners: [email protected]
Vehicle: 2025 Tesla Model Y · VIN XP7YGCEK9SB621959.
© 2026 Bartosz Hernas · TeslaTookWhatIPaidFor.com · This site states the owner’s personal account and opinion. All screenshots are from the owner’s own vehicle and Tesla communications. Not affiliated with Tesla, Inc.